Because I Promised I’d Always Remind You…

A new story about our Metropolitan Police militia has come to light:

Like most visitors to London, Klaus Matzka and his teenage son Loris took several photographs of some of the city’s sights, including the famous red double-decker buses. More unusually perhaps, they also took pictures of the Vauxhall bus station, which Matzka regards as “modern sculpture”.

But the tourists have said they had to return home to Vienna without their holiday pictures after two policemen forced them to delete the photographs from their cameras in the name of preventing terrorism.

Matkza, a 69-year-old retired television cameraman with a taste for modern architecture, was told that photographing anything to do with transport was “strictly forbidden”. The policemen also recorded the pair’s details, including passport numbers and hotel addresses.

Terrorists?

An older post on the Register reminds us:

This sort of action is a great shame, and something of an own goal by the police, since guidelines on photography published by various forces and by ACPO are actually quite good. These point out that there is no general power to stop an individual taking photos. Nor are police allowed to remove film or cameras from photographers: such action would almost always be unlawful and probably constitute theft.

Meanwhile, the NPIA sent over an advance copy of their guidelines on stop and search under the dread s.44. These state:

The Terrorism Act 2000 does not prohibit people from taking photographs or digital images in an area where an authority under section 44 is in place. Officers should not prevent people taking photographs unless they are in an area where photography is prevented by other legislation.If officers reasonably suspect that photographs are being taken as part of hostile terrorist reconnaissance, a search under section 43 of the Terrorism Act 2000 or an arrest should be considered. Film and memory cards may be seized as part of the search, but officers do not have a legal power to delete images or destroy film. Although images may be viewed as part of a search, to preserve evidence when cameras or other devices are seized, officers should not normally attempt to examine them.

Cameras and other devices should be left in the state they were found and forwarded to appropriately trained staff for forensic examination. The person being searched should never be asked or allowed to turn the device on or off because of the danger of evidence being lost or damaged.

Advertisements

3 responses to “Because I Promised I’d Always Remind You…

  1. For some reason they are particularly exercised about Vauxhall bus station – I’ve heard of them doing this to photographers before (from flickr). Because of its proximity to MI6, I wonder? Absolutely crazy, anyway.

  2. I’m afraid some policemen do see photographers as fair game. Terrorists, paedophiles – any scare will do if you want to throw your weight about. Remember the recent story of the man who photographed buses ? You might consider it a strange hobby but it’s perfectly legal. He got so sick of being stopped by police calling him a paedophile that he gave up. We may not be as bad as a North Korea, but increasingly paranoia sets the agenda of our policing politics, and our police are merely following suit.

  3. This actually happened to me in Madrid. The child in me wanted to take pictures of a policemen that looked like Robocop and these ruddy great big tanks: but I didn’t realise they were protecting the American embassy and my poor little Fuji was quickly snatched off me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s